Summary
rejecting Tobler's challenge to the constitutionality of the prison releasee reoffender statute, citing to Chapa and Lopez
Summary of this case from Ryland v. StateOpinion
Case No. 5D18–80
04-06-2018
Khris A. Tobler, Century, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.
Khris A. Tobler, Century, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM
AFFIRMED. We reject Appellant's argument that the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act is unconstitutional because it allows the judge, rather than the jury, to determine whether a defendant qualifies as a prison releasee reoffender for sentencing purposes. See Chapa v. State , 159 So.3d 361, 362 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ; Lopez v. State , 135 So.3d 539, 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).
COHEN, C.J., TORPY, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.