From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

T.G.G. v. P.M.L

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 5, 1995
661 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Summary

reversing the judgment of attorney's fees and costs because the trial court failed to make a specific finding, "which is mandatory," regarding the number of hours the appellee's counsel reasonably expended in the case and holding that a case must be reversed for further proceedings if a court fails to set forth the specific findings required by Rowe "[e]ven when there is competent, substantial evidence in the record to support a court's award of attorney's fees"

Summary of this case from Wanda v. City of Apalachicola

Opinion

No. 94-3739.

October 5, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Escambia County, Terry D. Terrell, J.

Frederick J. Gant of Allbritton Gant, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.

No appearance, for Appellee.


Appellant, T.G.G., appeals a judgment of attorney's fees and costs entered in his custody dispute with appellee, P.M.L. We reverse, because the trial court failed to make a specific finding, which is mandatory, regarding the number of hours appellee's counsel reasonably expended in this case. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 1985); Loper v. Allstate Ins. Co., 616 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Jones v. Associates Fin., Inc., 565 So.2d 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Even when there is competent, substantial evidence in the record to support a court's award of attorney's fees, the case must be reversed for further proceedings if the court failed to set forth the specific findings required by Rowe. Park Lane Condominium Ass'n v. DePadua, 558 So.2d 85 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Hoffay v. Hoffay, 555 So.2d 1309 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Manuel v. Manuel, 498 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

Because we are reversing on appellant's first issue, we do not reach his second.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

T.G.G. v. P.M.L

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 5, 1995
661 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

reversing the judgment of attorney's fees and costs because the trial court failed to make a specific finding, "which is mandatory," regarding the number of hours the appellee's counsel reasonably expended in the case and holding that a case must be reversed for further proceedings if a court fails to set forth the specific findings required by Rowe "[e]ven when there is competent, substantial evidence in the record to support a court's award of attorney's fees"

Summary of this case from Wanda v. City of Apalachicola

In T.G.G. v. P.M.L., 661 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), we held that reversal of an order awarding attorney's fees is required when the court fails to make specific findings regarding the hours reasonably expended "[e]ven when there is competent substantial evidence in the record to support a court's award of attorney's fees."

Summary of this case from Wanda v. City of Apalachicola
Case details for

T.G.G. v. P.M.L

Case Details

Full title:T.G.G., FATHER OF J.L.G., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. P.M.L., N/K/A P.M.S.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 5, 1995

Citations

661 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Wanda v. City of Apalachicola

Although there is competent, substantial evidence in the record to support the award of attorneys' fees, it…

Hysmith v. Hysmith

See Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 1985). Accord Messana v. Seaside Cmty. Dev.…