In Terner v. Brighton Foods, Inc. (27 Misc.3d 1225[A], 910 N.Y.S.2d 409 [Civ.Ct. N.Y. Co.2010]), it was after an inquest that the court dismissed the petition, where the "uncontroverted evidence" established that petitioners had transferred their interest three weeks prior to commencement of the proceeding.
Summary of this case from Vargas v. SoteloNo. 70896/09.
May 14, 2010.
Landlord and Tenant — Summary Proceedings — Standing — Estoppel.
In Terner v. Brighton Foods, Inc. (27 Misc.3d 1225[A], 910 N.Y.S.2d 409 [Civ.Ct. N.Y. Co.2010]), it was after an inquest that the court dismissed the petition, where the "uncontroverted evidence" established that petitioners had transferred their interest three weeks prior to commencement of the proceeding.
Summary of this case from Vargas v. SoteloFull title:SARAH TERNER, MICHELLE FELIX, AND RUBIN ROLNICK, Petitioners, v. BRIGHTON…
Court:Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County
Date published: May 14, 2010
Although the Respondent does not expressly argue that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, her…
City of New York v. Elizabeth St.As tenant points out, an allegation that petitioner is not the owner of the premises may be raised as a…