In Talisman Sugar Corporation v. Bruce, 8 FCR 268, cert. den., 296 So.2d 49 (Fla. 1974), the Commission affirmed a finding of compensability when the claimant, who was not the aggressor, was shot on his employer's premises by a fellow worker.
Summary of this case from Spleen v. Rogers Group, Inc.No. 45038.
June 6, 1974.
Certiorari denied.
ADKINS, C.J., and ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
BOYD, J., dissents.
In Talisman Sugar Corporation v. Bruce, 8 FCR 268, cert. den., 296 So.2d 49 (Fla. 1974), the Commission affirmed a finding of compensability when the claimant, who was not the aggressor, was shot on his employer's premises by a fellow worker.
Summary of this case from Spleen v. Rogers Group, Inc.Full title:TALISMAN SUGAR CORPORATION AND HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONERS, v…
Court:Supreme Court of Florida
Date published: Jun 6, 1974
The Commission held that regardless of the applicability of the positional-risk doctrine the claimant would…
Normandy Ins. Co. v. BouayadThis Court has always, until now, condemned this very emphasis. See Speen v. Rogers Grp., Inc., 548 So.2d…