From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TAKAYAMA v. ZERA

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Mar 18, 2010
122 Haw. 352 (Haw. Ct. App. 2010)

Summary

holding that even if denial of summary judgment was erroneous, error was harmless because appellant prevailed at trial and did not allege any harm from denial of summary judgment

Summary of this case from Hawaiian Ass'n of Seventh-Day Adventists, Non-Profit Corp. v. Wong

Opinion

No. 27900.

March 18, 2010.


Summary Dispositional Orders Affirmed.


Summaries of

TAKAYAMA v. ZERA

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Mar 18, 2010
122 Haw. 352 (Haw. Ct. App. 2010)

holding that even if denial of summary judgment was erroneous, error was harmless because appellant prevailed at trial and did not allege any harm from denial of summary judgment

Summary of this case from Hawaiian Ass'n of Seventh-Day Adventists, Non-Profit Corp. v. Wong
Case details for

TAKAYAMA v. ZERA

Case Details

Full title:Takayama v. Zera

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii

Date published: Mar 18, 2010

Citations

122 Haw. 352 (Haw. Ct. App. 2010)
226 P.3d 522

Citing Cases

Powell v. Ohana Military Cmtys.

The district court in Barber noted the Intermediate Court of Appeals found residential leases do not confer…

Hawaiian Ass'n of Seventh-Day Adventists, Non-Profit Corp. v. Wong

Therefore, even if the Circuit Court erred by not granting Wong's motion for partial summary judgment, such…