From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.Z. v. Dept. of Ch. Fam. Serv

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 2, 2004
873 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Summary

finding that providing an incomplete discovery packet late in the day on Friday before a Monday hearing constituted an impermissible trial by ambush resulting in a denial of due process

Summary of this case from Valdes v. Valdes

Opinion

Case Nos. 3D03-1915, 3D03-1742.

Opinion filed June 2, 2004.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Sandra Taylor, Judge, Lower Tribunal No. 01-244.

Joseph M. Albury (Key West), for appellants.

Calianne P. Lantz, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY, J., and COBB, Warren H., Senior Judge.


Appellants S.Z. and S.M., the mother and father of D.M., appeal from an Order of Adjudication and Judgment of Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights. An adjudicatory hearing was held on Monday, June 9, 2003. Appellants' trial counsel was not provided with a discovery packet until late in the day on the Friday before the hearing. That packet did not contain a witness list, many of the filings from the dependency case, or the list of exhibits to be presented and relied upon at the hearing. We agree with appellants that this turned the hearing into a trial by ambush that violated their due process rights. Accordingly, the termination order is reversed and the case remanded for a new hearing.

Reversed and remanded for a new hearing.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF.


Summaries of

S.Z. v. Dept. of Ch. Fam. Serv

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 2, 2004
873 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

finding that providing an incomplete discovery packet late in the day on Friday before a Monday hearing constituted an impermissible trial by ambush resulting in a denial of due process

Summary of this case from Valdes v. Valdes

concluding that where trial counsel was not provided with a discovery packet until late in the day on Friday and the packet did not contain materials to be presented and relied upon at a Monday hearing, "this turned the hearing into a trial by ambush that violated [appellants'] due process rights"

Summary of this case from J.S.L. Construction Co. v. Levy
Case details for

S.Z. v. Dept. of Ch. Fam. Serv

Case Details

Full title:S.Z. and S.M., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 2, 2004

Citations

873 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Valdes v. Valdes

Needless to say, this mode of proceeding was highly prejudicial and should not have been countenanced. See…

Reive v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.

The failure to give adequate notice of evidence and witnesses constitutes a due process violation. S.Z. v.…