From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Supino v. PV Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 2002
291 A.D.2d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-09838

Submitted January 23, 2002.

February 19, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant PV Holding Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated June 4, 2001, which denied its motion to change the venue of the action from Queens County to Nassau County.

Curtis, Vasile, Devine McElhenny, Merrick, N.Y. (Robert M. Smith of counsel), for appellant.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, HOWARD MILLER, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, all papers filed in this action and certified copies of all minutes and entries (see, CPLR 511[d]).

The Supreme Court erred in denying the appellant's motion to change the venue of this action from Queens County to Nassau County. The plaintiffs improperly placed the venue of this action in Queens County, where none of the parties reside, thereby forfeiting their right to designate venue (see, CPLR 503[a]; Bailon v. Avis Rent A Car, 270 A.D.2d 439; Anderson v. Ungar, 267 A.D.2d 186). The appellant then promptly moved to change venue to a proper county after ascertaining the plaintiffs' true county of residence (see, Buziashvili v. Ryan, 264 A.D.2d 797; O'Connor v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, 231 A.D.2d 700; Philogene v. Fuller Auto Leasing, 167 A.D.2d 178). The order therefore must be reversed and the motion granted.

RITTER, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, O'BRIEN, H. MILLER and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Supino v. PV Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 2002
291 A.D.2d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Supino v. PV Holding Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ROCCO SUPINO, ET AL., respondents, v. PV HOLDING CORP., appellant, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 19, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 675

Citing Cases

Neu v. St. John's Episcopal Hospital

It is undisputed that the plaintiff Peter Neu resided in Suffolk County at the time of commencement, although…

Forbes v. Rubinovich

Furthermore, aside from a conclusory statement contained in his affidavit that he resided at an address in…