From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Summers v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Oct 27, 2014
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-908-WHA (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 27, 2014)

Summary

holding that the district court's decision to grant a Section 3852(c) motion rendered the defendant's Section 2255 claims moot because the revised sentence "is the lowest possible sentence he may receive under the controlling statutes."

Summary of this case from Lopez v. United States

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-908-WHA (WO)

10-27-2014

KELVIN SUMMERS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent.


FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered in this case on this day,

Final Judgment is entered in favor of the United States of America and against the Petitioner, Kelvin Summers, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE this 27th day of October, 2014.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Summers v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Oct 27, 2014
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-908-WHA (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 27, 2014)

holding that the district court's decision to grant a Section 3852(c) motion rendered the defendant's Section 2255 claims moot because the revised sentence "is the lowest possible sentence he may receive under the controlling statutes."

Summary of this case from Lopez v. United States

finding that alleged failure of appellate counsel to advise defendant of his right to proceed with a discretionary appeal did not deprive defendant of a constitutional right

Summary of this case from Kennedy v. Crabtree
Case details for

Summers v. United States

Case Details

Full title:KELVIN SUMMERS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 27, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-908-WHA (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 27, 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. Morrow

guiar v. United States,––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 357, 181 L.Ed.2d 225 (2011); Palmer v. United States,––– U.S.…

United States v. Funez

While the Tenth Circuit has not spoken on whether a petition for rehearing is a discretionary level of…