From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Street of Shops, Inc. v. Clifford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 12, 1963
20 A.D.2d 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

December 12, 1963

Appeal from the Monroe Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, McClusky, Henry and Noonan, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: In the exercise of a proper discretion Special Term should have granted the application to remove to Supreme Court and try jointly with this action the summary proceeding pending in County Court. In the absence of a complaint in the Supreme Court action we assume that it will contain allegations similar to those found in the answer in the summary proceeding except that requested relief will be for rescission of the lease as well as for money damages. Upon this assumption we find identity of factual issues. If either party applies for a preference the motion should be granted. The trial of the summary proceeding should not be delayed by pretrial proceedings. We do not reach or pass upon the question of the jurisdiction of County Court to entertain in the summary proceeding a counterclaim seeking equitable relief for rescission of the lease.


Summaries of

Street of Shops, Inc. v. Clifford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 12, 1963
20 A.D.2d 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Street of Shops, Inc. v. Clifford

Case Details

Full title:STREET OF SHOPS, INC., Appellant, v. ROBERT F. CLIFFORD, Respondent. In…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 12, 1963

Citations

20 A.D.2d 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

McDermott v. Florio

Ordered, that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the summary…

McCarthy v. Lewin

To avoid any undue delay of trial, if either party applies for a trial preference such motion should be…