From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDermott v. Florio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 1989
155 A.D.2d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

November 6, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Buell, J.).


Ordered, that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the summary proceeding now pending in the City Court of the City of Yonkers entitled Florio v McDermott is removed to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, and consolidated with the present action.

The plaintiff demonstrated that the two pending suits involve "common question[s] of law or fact" (CPLR 602 [a]) so that the removal of the summary proceeding to the Supreme Court, and its consolidation with the pending action for a declaratory judgment, is appropriate in light of the absence of any claim of prejudice by the defendant Florio (see, CPLR 602 [a], [b]; Del Bello v Wilmot, 59 A.D.2d 1023; Street of Shops v Clifford, 20 A.D.2d 622; cf., Earbert Rest. v Little Luxuries, 99 A.D.2d 734). In this case, not only did Florio not claim prejudice, but he defaulted in responding to the motion for consolidation, and thus may be deemed to have consented to the relief requested. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McDermott v. Florio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 1989
155 A.D.2d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

McDermott v. Florio

Case Details

Full title:FRANK McDERMOTT, Appellant, v. PETER FLORIO, Respondent, et al., Defendants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1989

Citations

155 A.D.2d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Kunkel v. Kunkel, 2009 NY Slip Op 30772(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 3/30/2009)

The alleged equitable interest is insufficient to sustain a cause of action for partition (RPAPL § 901). With…

Kunkel v. Kunkel

The alleged equitable interest is insufficient to sustain a cause of action for partition (RPAPL § 901). With…