From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Straz v. Kansas Bankers Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Aug 18, 1998
165 F.3d 33 (7th Cir. 1998)

Summary

holding that the court had jurisdiction over the district court’s approval of writs of execution

Summary of this case from United States v. Parker

Opinion

97-4245.

August 18, 1998.

Appeal from E.D.Wis., 986 F.Supp. 563.


Decisions without Published Decisions Affirmed.


Summaries of

Straz v. Kansas Bankers Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Aug 18, 1998
165 F.3d 33 (7th Cir. 1998)

holding that the court had jurisdiction over the district court’s approval of writs of execution

Summary of this case from United States v. Parker

holding that State law exemptions do not limit the government's power to enforce compliance with a restitution order

Summary of this case from United States v. Blondeau

holding that defendant was not entitled to a hearing when he did not file a "valid claim of exemption"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Miller

holding that a "hearing under the FDCPA is limited to the determination of whether the property is subject to a valid claim of exemption, whether the government complied with the statutory requirements for the issuance of a writ, and, if the judgment was by default, whether there exists good cause for setting aside the judgment."

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Young

concluding that district court did not err in denying a request for hearing because a hearing under the FDCPA is limited to whether there is a valid claim of exemption, whether the government has complied with statutory requirements for issuance of the writ, or if judgment, by default, whether there is a basis for overturning judgment; defendant failed to file a valid request for exemption and did not challenge the validity of the writ

Summary of this case from United States v. Karadzhova

upholding denial of transfer based on deference to district court which retained jurisdiction over underlying criminal proceedings

Summary of this case from United States v. Beverly

upholding dismissal of complaint as frivolous when "most if not all" of the allegations the plaintiff included described 'fantastic or delusional scenarios' that are factually frivolous"

Summary of this case from Ferguson v. U.S. HSS

upholding dismissal of complaint as frivolous when "most if not all" of the allegations the plaintiff included described 'fantastic or delusional scenarios' that are factually frivolous"

Summary of this case from Ferguson v. Georgia

affirming dismissal of complaint as frivolous where plaintiff alleged that police attempted to kill him, there was a multi-agency conspiracy to cover up the assaults, the attorney general's office faked a trial, and he was issued a fraudulent marriage license

Summary of this case from Smith v. Penman

affirming dismissal of complaint as frivolous where plaintiff alleged that police attempted to kill him, that there was a multi-agency conspiracy to cover up the assaults, that the attorney general's office faked a trial, and that he was issued a fraudulent marriage license

Summary of this case from Taylor v. Weaver

affirming dismissal of complaint as frivolous where plaintiff alleged that police attempted to kill him, that there was a multi-agency conspiracy to cover up the assaults, that the attorney general's office faked a trial, and that he was issued a fraudulent marriage license

Summary of this case from Taylor v. Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse

affirming dismissal of complaint as frivolous where plaintiff alleged that police attempted to kill him, that there was a multi-agency conspiracy to cover up the assaults, that the attorney general's office faked a trial, and that he was issued a fraudulent marriage license

Summary of this case from Kemp v. U.S.
Case details for

Straz v. Kansas Bankers Co.

Case Details

Full title:Straz v. Kansas Bankers Sur. Co

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Date published: Aug 18, 1998

Citations

165 F.3d 33 (7th Cir. 1998)

Citing Cases

Chaney v. Cross

Proceeding pro se, Chaney has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241,…

United States v. Castellano

Courts, however, are 3 split on whether the right to transfer is absolute. Compare United States v. Nash, 175…