From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.T.G. Const. v. Staten Island Rapid Transit

U.S.
Jun 8, 1970
398 U.S. 951 (1970)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

finding that the Government, which incurred some of the costs that plaintiff sought from defendants, was not a necessary party under Rule 19 because the plaintiff would have to account to the Government for recovery it obtained, the defendants were unlikely to be sued independently by the Government, and the Court could afford complete relief between the parties

Summary of this case from Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Bauer
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 1492.

June 8, 1970.

C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 421 F. 2d 53.

Summaries of

S.T.G. Const. v. Staten Island Rapid Transit

U.S.
Jun 8, 1970
398 U.S. 951 (1970)

finding that the Government, which incurred some of the costs that plaintiff sought from defendants, was not a necessary party under Rule 19 because the plaintiff would have to account to the Government for recovery it obtained, the defendants were unlikely to be sued independently by the Government, and the Court could afford complete relief between the parties

Summary of this case from Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Bauer
Case details for

S.T.G. Const. v. Staten Island Rapid Transit

Case Details

Full title:S.T.G. CONSTRUCTION Co., INC. v. STATEN ISLAND RAPID TRANSIT RAILWAY Co

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 8, 1970

Citations

398 U.S. 951 (1970)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Florida Power Light Co.

We hold, as a matter of law, that the comments of the newspaper articles in question constitute factual…

United States v. Generes

Compare the decision below and Weddle v. Commissioner, 325 F.2d 849 (CA2 1963), with Niblock v. Commissioner,…

20 Citing Cases