From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stever v. Rea & Derick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 19, 1965
212 A.2d 90 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1965)

Summary

In Stever v. Rea Derick, 206 Pa. Super. 158, 212 A.2d 90, 93 (1965), the court said: "Upon appeal it is the duty of the court to review the evidence to determine whether the board's findings are supported by evidence sufficient to convince a reasonable mind to a fair degree of certainty, but the court may not weigh the evidence and substitute its judgment for that of the board."

Summary of this case from SKF Industries, Inc. v. Cody

Opinion

June 17, 1965.

July 19, 1965.

Workmen's Compensation — Total disability — Ownership and operation of poultry farm — Profits due to management of claimant's wife — Evidence.

In a workmen's compensation case, in which it appeared that claimant accidentally suffered contusions of the head with extra dural hemorrhage as a result of which he was totally disabled, and an agreement was entered into providing for compensation for total disability; that claimant suffered from post-concussional syndrome, having a memory defect, impaired judgment, and considerable mental deterioration; that claimant's wife purchased a chicken farm and with claimant moved to the farm in an effort to prevent a mental collapse on the part of claimant and for the purpose of trying to rehabilitate him; that the wife handled all of the financial transactions, kept all the records, employed help when necessary, and claimant worked when he felt like it; that there was evidence that the profits from the operation of the poultry farm were due to the joint efforts in the family, largely under the supervision and management of the wife, and not the result of claimant's management and endeavor; that the board found that claimant approximately twenty-three years later continued to be totally disabled as a result of the accidental injury; and that the court below, holding that defendants had failed to sustain the burden of proof, dismissed the employer's petition to terminate; it was Held that the order of the court below should be affirmed.

Argued June 17, 1965.

Before ERVIN, P.J., WRIGHT, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, JACOBS, and HOFFMAN, JJ. (FLOOD, J., absent).

Appeal, No. 348, Oct. T., 1965, from order of Court of Common Pleas of Huntingdon County, Dec. T., 1964, No. 29, in case of Joseph M. Stever v. Rea Derick et al. Order affirmed.

Same case in court below: 36 Pa. D. C.2d 581.

Appeal by defendants from order of Workmen's Compensation Board dismissing petition to terminate compensation agreement.

Order entered dismissing appeal, opinion by SNYDER, J., specially presiding. Defendants appealed.

John M. Fitzpatrick, with him Joseph B. Thompson, for appellants.

Samuel H. Stewart, with him R. Merle Heffner, for appellee.


The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Huntingdon County is affirmed on the opinion of Judge RICHARD C. SNYDER, 57th Judicial District, specially presiding for the court below, reported at 36 Pa. D. C.2d 581.


Summaries of

Stever v. Rea & Derick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 19, 1965
212 A.2d 90 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1965)

In Stever v. Rea Derick, 206 Pa. Super. 158, 212 A.2d 90, 93 (1965), the court said: "Upon appeal it is the duty of the court to review the evidence to determine whether the board's findings are supported by evidence sufficient to convince a reasonable mind to a fair degree of certainty, but the court may not weigh the evidence and substitute its judgment for that of the board."

Summary of this case from SKF Industries, Inc. v. Cody
Case details for

Stever v. Rea & Derick

Case Details

Full title:Stever v. Rea Derick et al., Appellants

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 19, 1965

Citations

212 A.2d 90 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1965)
212 A.2d 90

Citing Cases

Summit Trailer Sales v. W.C.A.B

However, it has long been recognized that profits derived from a family-owned business may not be accepted as…

SKF Industries, Inc. v. Cody

" In Stever v. Rea Derick, 206 Pa. Super. 158, 212 A.2d 90, 93 (1965), the court said: "Upon appeal it is…