Summary
In Steinam v. Strauss (44 N.Y. St. Repr. 380) Presiding Justice VAN BRUNT, writing for the court, said: "Two questions are raised upon this appeal. The first is whether the judgment was void upon its face, and the second whether as matter of fact and from proof of extraneous circumstances, it was invalid.
Summary of this case from McCaddon v. Central Trust Co.Opinion
Argued January 26, 1893
Decided February 10, 1893
Alex. Blumenstiel for appellants.
Nathaniel Myers for respondents.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.