From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wyeth

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 27, 2011
373 P.3d 964 (Nev. 2011)

Summary

declining to address the continuing violation doctrine due to an insufficient record

Summary of this case from Nickler v. Clark Cnty.

Opinion

No. 55744.

07-27-2011

The STATE of Nevada, Appellant, v. WYETH; Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Pfizer, Inc.; and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC, Respondents.

Attorney General/Consumer Protection Bureau/Las Vegas White & Wetherall, LLP/Las Vegas Littlepage Booth Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas Lewis & Roca, LLP/Las Vegas


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Reversed/Remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Wyeth

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 27, 2011
373 P.3d 964 (Nev. 2011)

declining to address the continuing violation doctrine due to an insufficient record

Summary of this case from Nickler v. Clark Cnty.
Case details for

State v. Wyeth

Case Details

Full title:The STATE of Nevada, Appellant, v. WYETH; Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jul 27, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 964 (Nev. 2011)

Citing Cases

Nickler v. Clark Cnty.

Indeed, the Nevada Supreme Court has regularly avoided addressing the issue, even when litigants before the…

Drye v. Glatfelter Claims Mgmt.

But Plaintiffs cite to no case, and this Court has found no case where the Nevada Supreme Court applied this…