reviewing double jeopardy claim, despite defendant's failure to "explicit[ly] mention" issue at trial, when "trial court possibly addressed and ruled upon" issue
Summary of this case from State v. LindseyNo. COA13–812.
2014-01-21
STATE of North Carolina v. Ronald Laflew WOODRUFF.
Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Phyllis Tranchese, for the State. Peter Wood for Defendant.
reviewing double jeopardy claim, despite defendant's failure to "explicit[ly] mention" issue at trial, when "trial court possibly addressed and ruled upon" issue
Summary of this case from State v. LindseyFull title:STATE of North Carolina v. Ronald Laflew WOODRUFF.
Court:Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Date published: Jan 21, 2014
Consequently, when the record shows that "the trial court addressed and ruled upon" a constitutional issue,…