In State v. Tuller, 34 Conn. 280, 299, we said, "In England if two different felonies are charged in separate counts, the court will quash the indictment, but that is not the practice here."
Summary of this case from State v. BradleyNo. A119120.
April 20, 2005.
Case affirmed without opinion.
In State v. Tuller, 34 Conn. 280, 299, we said, "In England if two different felonies are charged in separate counts, the court will quash the indictment, but that is not the practice here."
Summary of this case from State v. BradleyFull title:STATE v. CARL ALLEN TULLER
Court:Oregon Court of Appeals
Date published: Apr 20, 2005
Defendant in error has mistaken his forum, as this action cannot be maintained in a state court. In re Eno,…
UTZ v. WARDENThis failure to object was a major, although not necessarily fatal, impediment to an appeal. "A defendant…