From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Swader

Oregon Supreme Court
Aug 27, 1985
299 Or. 729 (Or. 1985)

Opinion

CC 10-82-06460; CA A28791; SC S31658

On appellant's petition for review from decision of Court of Appeals, Petition allowed, case remanded to trial court for further proceedings August 27, 1985

Appeal from Lane County Circuit Court, Gregory G. Foote, Judge. 72 Or. App. 593, 697 P.2d 557 (1985).

In Banc

John Daugirda, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Robert E. Barton, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for respondent on review. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petition for review allowed.

The Court of Appeals is reversed and the case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The defendant was convicted of Sodomy in the First Degree in a trial without a jury before the circuit court.

We allow review on the issues raised in the petition for review that the trial court erroneously admitted hearsay declarations of the alleged victim and that the defendant's state and federal confrontation rights were denied.

This case presents the same issues raised and decided in State v. Campbell, 299 Or. 633, 705 P.2d 694 (1985).

The Court of Appeals is reversed and the case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the decision in State v. Campbell, supra.


Summaries of

State v. Swader

Oregon Supreme Court
Aug 27, 1985
299 Or. 729 (Or. 1985)
Case details for

State v. Swader

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. GARY LAWRENCE SWADER, Petitioner…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Aug 27, 1985

Citations

299 Or. 729 (Or. 1985)
705 P.2d 196

Citing Cases

State v. Swader

Argued and submitted February 29, 1984Affirmed March 13, 1985 Reconsideration denied April 19, 1985 Petition…

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Department of Revenue

In Burlington Northern, the Oregon Supreme Court also held that the railroad system of accounting, required…