From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sprang

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 25, 1995
904 P.2d 1092 (Or. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

93050884; CA A83827

Argued and submitted August 31, 1995.

Affirmed October 25, 1995.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Linn County, Jackson L. Frost, Judge.

Eric Johansen, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Stephanie S. Andrus, Assistant Attorney General.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.


LEESON, J.

Affirmed.



Defendant, a building contractor, was convicted on three counts of aggravated theft in the first degree, ORS 164.057, for misappropriating money he had received to perform work on the residences of three victims. As part of his sentence, the trial court ordered that he make restitution to the victims. ORS 137.106. Defendant assigns error to that ruling, claiming that a preconviction discharge in bankruptcy of his civil debt to the victims bars the restitution order.

In State v. Davis, 116 Or. App. 607, 610, 843 P.2d 460 (1992), we applied Kelly v. Robinson, 479 U.S. 36, 50, 107 S Ct 353, 93 L Ed 2d 216 (1986), to hold that a chapter 7 discharge in bankruptcy does not discharge the obligation to make restitution that is imposed as part of a criminal sentence. It is not relevant whether the discharge in bankruptcy occurred after the restitution order, as in Kelly, or before the restitution order, as in Davis. See State v. Moriarty, 87 Or. App. 465, 470, 742 P.2d 704, rev den 304 Or. 547 (1987) (statute does not require that civil damages be recoverable at the time restitution is imposed).

Defendant does not specify the chapter under which he filed for bankruptcy. In Kelly, the United States Supreme Court held that restitution ordered by a state criminal court falls within the exceptions to chapter 7 discharge specified at 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(7). 479 U.S. at 53. Subsequently, the Criminal Victims Protection Act of 1990, Pub L 101-581, 104 Stat 2865, prevented the discharge of a restitution order under chapter 13 of the bankruptcy code. 11 U.S.C. § 1328(a).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Sprang

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 25, 1995
904 P.2d 1092 (Or. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

State v. Sprang

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. PHILLIP JOHN SPRANG, III, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 25, 1995

Citations

904 P.2d 1092 (Or. Ct. App. 1995)
904 P.2d 1092

Citing Cases

In re Jeffries

See, In re Mann, 88 B.R. 427, 430 (Bankr.S.D.Florida 1988), Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Ingram, et al.,…