Summary
affirming the denial of Appellant’s motion requesting court costs be taxed against the State
Summary of this case from State v. SpencerOpinion
No. ED 83578.
May 11, 2004. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 8, 2004. Application for Transfer Denied August 24, 2004.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Evelyn M. Baker, Judge.
Frederick Spencer, Pacific, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Anne E. Edgington, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
ORDER
Frederick Spencer appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion to vacate its order denying his request, filed pursuant to Section 550.040 RSMo 1994, for the taxing of costs in his favor. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the trial court's judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).