From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Simpson

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Sep 28, 1989
545 So. 2d 1047 (La. 1989)

Summary

In Simpson, counsel for defendant filed a Motion for Random Selection of Trial Judge, almost identical to the motion filed by defendant in the case at bar.

Summary of this case from State v. Romero

Opinion

No. 89-KK-0821.

June 16, 1989. Rehearing Granted September 28, 1989.

In re Simpson, William J.; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Lafayette 15th Judicial District Court, Div. "E", No. 88CR-55996; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW89-0244.


Granted. It is ordered that assignment of this case is vacated; the case is remanded to the 15th Judicial District Court which is instructed to reassign under a system where the District Attorney's office does not select the judge and where trial dates are approved by the court; otherwise denied.


Summaries of

State v. Simpson

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Sep 28, 1989
545 So. 2d 1047 (La. 1989)

In Simpson, counsel for defendant filed a Motion for Random Selection of Trial Judge, almost identical to the motion filed by defendant in the case at bar.

Summary of this case from State v. Romero
Case details for

State v. Simpson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. WILLIAM J. SIMPSON

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Sep 28, 1989

Citations

545 So. 2d 1047 (La. 1989)

Citing Cases

State v. Romero

Therefore, the State claims that any error committed was harmless. Recently, the Louisiana Supreme Court…

State v. Montgomery

(e) Other assignments of error appearing from review of the transcript of the trial; Defendant contends in…