holding that officer was not required to consult owner of car about the disposition of the vehicle when it was obstructing traffic
Summary of this case from Marks v. ScafeNo. 89,610.
November 26, 2003.
Appeal from the Saline.
Unpublished Opinions Affirmed.
holding that officer was not required to consult owner of car about the disposition of the vehicle when it was obstructing traffic
Summary of this case from Marks v. ScafeFull title:State v. Shelton
Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas
Date published: Nov 26, 2003
Any argument that the inventory search was illegal was futile under Kansas law.See State v. Bornholdt, 932…