From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Romero

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
May 31, 2018
NO. A-1-CA-35526 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 31, 2018)

Opinion

NO. A-1-CA-35526

05-31-2018

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FELIX ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant.

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM Laurie Blevins, Assistant Attorney General Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender William O'Connell, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Appellant


This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY
George P. Eichwald, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM
Laurie Blevins, Assistant Attorney General
Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender
William O'Connell, Assistant Appellate Defender
Santa Fe, NM for Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VANZI, Chief Judge. {1} Defendant appeals the judgment and sentence convicting him of multiple counts of possession of child pornography, in violation of NMSA 1978, Section 30-6A-3(A) (2007, amended 2016). Defendant contends that under the dictates of State v. Olsson, 2014-NMSC-012, 324 P.3d 1230, he should only have been convicted of one count. The State agrees with Defendant's argument. While we are not bound by the State's concession, see State v. Guerra, 2012-NMSC-027, ¶ 9, 284 P.3d 1076, we have examined the facts and circumstances of this case and find that Defendant's argument and the State's concession are correct statements of the law as applied to this case. We therefore hold that Defendant should have been convicted of only one count of possession of child pornography. We reverse and remand for vacation of all but one of Defendant's convictions and for further proceedings as may be appropriate.

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

/s/ _________
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge /s/ _________
JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge


Summaries of

State v. Romero

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
May 31, 2018
NO. A-1-CA-35526 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 31, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Romero

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FELIX ROMERO…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: May 31, 2018

Citations

NO. A-1-CA-35526 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 31, 2018)