From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rizal

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Feb 17, 2017
389 P.3d 1006 (Kan. Ct. App. 2017)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

explaining that "even the police did not know that the packages they confiscated contained naphthoylindole [ (a synthetic cannabinoid) ] until the crime lab tested the packages"

Summary of this case from State v. Arias
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 115,036

02-17-2017

STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Yamuna RIZAL, Appellant.

Jonathan Laurans and Christopher Angles, of Kansas City, Missouri, for appellant. James Crux, legal intern, Jacob Gontesky, assistant district attorney, Steven J. Obermeier, senior deputy district attorney, Stephen M. Howe, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, for appellee.

Affirmed.

Summaries of

State v. Rizal

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Feb 17, 2017
389 P.3d 1006 (Kan. Ct. App. 2017)

explaining that "even the police did not know that the packages they confiscated contained naphthoylindole [ (a synthetic cannabinoid) ] until the crime lab tested the packages"

Summary of this case from State v. Arias
Case details for

State v. Rizal

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Yamuna RIZAL, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: Feb 17, 2017

Citations

389 P.3d 1006 (Kan. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. Arias

ly complex nature of these substances. See, e.g. , Salazar , 2018-NMCA-030, ¶ 35, ––– P.3d –––– ; see also…

1 Citing Cases