From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Riddle

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Apr 16, 1990
391 S.E.2d 253 (S.C. 1990)

Summary

holding the nature of the offense was changed when an indictment was amended from assault with intent to commit third-degree criminal sexual conduct to assault with intent to commit first-degree criminal sexual conduct because the punishment for the amended offense was different from the punishment for the original offense

Summary of this case from State v. Bryson

Opinion

23196

Heard October 30, 1989.

Decided April 16, 1990.

Asst. Appellate Defenders Stephen P. Williams and Joseph L. Savitz, III, both of S.C. Office of Appellate Defense, Columbia, for appellant.

Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Asst. Attys. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr., and Norman Mark Rapport, Columbia, and Solicitor William L. Ferguson, York, for respondent.


Heard Oct. 30, 1989.

Decided April 16, 1990.


Amended Opinion Number 23127, 387 S.E.2d 455, is vacated, and the following substituted in its place.

Appellant, Bruce Eugene Riddle (Riddle) contends the Circuit Court erred in permitting an amendment to his indictment during the course of trial. We agree and reverse.

Riddle was indicted for assault with intent to commit third degree criminal sexual conduct. At the close of evidence, the indictment was amended to charge assault with intent to commit first degree criminal sexual conduct. The sole issue we address in whether the amendment was proper.

S.C. Code Ann. § 17-19-100 (1976) permits amendment of an indictment provided the nature of the offense charged is not changed. Here, the amendment increases the lesser charge of assault with intent to commit third degree criminal sexual conduct to the greater charge of assault with intent to commit first degree criminal sexual conduct. Punishment for third agree may not exceed ten years, while first degree is punishable by up to thirty years.

The amendment clearly exceeded the terms of the statute.

Appellant's third issue is dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 23; State v. Lyle, 125 S.C. 406, 118 S.E. 803 (1923), and his first degree burglary conviction is affirmed.

Accordingly, the judgment above is affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded.

GREGORY, C.J., and HARWELL, FINNEY and TOAL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Riddle

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Apr 16, 1990
391 S.E.2d 253 (S.C. 1990)

holding the nature of the offense was changed when an indictment was amended from assault with intent to commit third-degree criminal sexual conduct to assault with intent to commit first-degree criminal sexual conduct because the punishment for the amended offense was different from the punishment for the original offense

Summary of this case from State v. Bryson
Case details for

State v. Riddle

Case Details

Full title:The STATE, Respondent v. Bruce Eugene RIDDLE, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Apr 16, 1990

Citations

391 S.E.2d 253 (S.C. 1990)
391 S.E.2d 253

Citing Cases

State v. Ervin

aver all elements of assault with intent to commit first degree criminal sexual conduct. The fatal flaw in…

State v. Myers

The trial court amended the indictment to charge Myers with arson under S.C. Code Ann § 16-11-140 (1985).…