From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Renfro

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 7, 2006
360 N.C. 395 (N.C. 2006)

Opinion


627 S.E.2d 463 (N.C. 2006) 360 N.C. 395 STATE of North Carolina v. James Love RENFRO, Jr. No. 674A05. Supreme Court of North Carolina April 7, 2006

        Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 621 S.E.2d 221 (2005), finding no error in a judgment entered 7 June 2004 by Judge Jack A. Thompson in Superior Court, Cumberland County. Heard in the Supreme Court 16 March 2006.

        Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by James M. Stanley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

        George E. Kelly, III, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.

        PER CURIAM.

        Justice BRADY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd , 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

        AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Renfro

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 7, 2006
360 N.C. 395 (N.C. 2006)
Case details for

State v. Renfro

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES LOVE RENFRO, JR

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 7, 2006

Citations

360 N.C. 395 (N.C. 2006)
360 N.C. 395

Citing Cases

State v. Slade

However, this Court has held the admission of evidence of prior convictions which would be inadmissible under…

State v. Schiro

State v. Coffey, 326 N.C. 268, 278–79, 389 S.E.2d 48, 54 (1990). Additionally, “Rule 404(b) ... allows for…