From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 2002
568 S.E.2d 190 (N.C. 2002)

Opinion

No. 19A02

Filed 20 December 2002

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 147 N.C. App. 455, 556 S.E.2d 30 (2001), reversing and remanding an order for summary judgment entered 22 March 2000 and an order denying reconsideration entered 24 May 2000, both orders entered by Martin (Jerry Cash), J., in Superior Court, Burke County. Heard in the Supreme Court 3 December 2002.

Daniel Law Firm P.A., by Stephen T. Daniel and Warren T. Daniel, for Plaintiff-Appellees. Young Moore and Henderson P.A., by Walter E. Brock, Jr., and Christopher A. Page, for Defendant-Appellant Commercial Union Midwest Insurance Company.


Justice BUTTERFIELD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court were equally divided, with three members voting to affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals and three members voting to reverse. Therefore, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Reese v. Barbee, 350 N.C. 60, 510 S.E.2d 374 (1999); Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 2002
568 S.E.2d 190 (N.C. 2002)
Case details for

Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:BARRETT L. CRAWFORD, Trustee in the bankruptcy of Jeter Edward Greene, and…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 2002

Citations

568 S.E.2d 190 (N.C. 2002)
568 S.E.2d 190

Citing Cases

Wornstaff v. Wornstaff

The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members…

Williams v. Vonderau

Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed without precedential value. See State v.…