From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nesbit v. Howard

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1993
429 S.E.2d 730 (N.C. 1993)

Opinion

No. 79PA92

Filed 4 June 1993

On discretionary review of an unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, 105 N.C. App. 105, 412 S.E.2d 373 (1992), reversing the judgment entered by John, J., in the Superior Court, Iredell County, on 14 September 1990 and remanding the case for trial on defendants' counterclaim for damages. Heard in the Supreme Court 6 October 1992.

Womble Carlyle Sandridge Rice, by Reid C. Adams, Jr., and Thomas L. Nesbit, for plaintiff-appellants.

David P. Parker for defendant-appellees.


Justice Parker recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Kempson v. N.C. Dept. of Human Resources, 328 N.C. 722, 403 S.E.2d 279 (1991).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Nesbit v. Howard

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1993
429 S.E.2d 730 (N.C. 1993)
Case details for

Nesbit v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:WILLIS G. NESBIT AND ELIZABETH C. NESBIT v. PAUL HOWARD AND EVELYN HOWARD

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1993

Citations

429 S.E.2d 730 (N.C. 1993)
429 S.E.2d 730

Citing Cases

Williamson v. Bullington

Therefore, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value.…

Tate v. Christy

The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members…