From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rachels

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 15, 2013
2013-UP-191 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 15, 2013)

Opinion

2013-UP-191

05-15-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Phillip Rachels, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2012-209831

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia; and Phillip Rachels, pro se, for Appellant. Tommy Evans, Jr., of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted April 1, 2013

Appeal From Aiken County Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia; and Phillip Rachels, pro se, for Appellant.

Tommy Evans, Jr., of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Rachels

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 15, 2013
2013-UP-191 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 15, 2013)
Case details for

State v. Rachels

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Phillip Rachels, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 15, 2013

Citations

2013-UP-191 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 15, 2013)