From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Linsley

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two
Aug 29, 1986
45 Wn. App. 1004 (Wash. Ct. App. 1986)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Linsley v. State, 88 Fla. 135, 101 So. 273, the Supreme Court said: "The taking of human life is neither justifiable or excusable where one fires the fatal shot or strikes the fatal blow after danger of death or great bodily harm to him from the deceased's attack has passed."

Summary of this case from State v. Wade
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 7707-8-II.

August 29, 1986. UNREPORTED OPINION

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 83-1-00223-1, Robert L. Harris, J., entered March 22, 1984.

Dismissed by unpublished opinion per Alexander, J., concurred in by Reed, A.C.J., and Petrich, J.

Summaries of

State v. Linsley

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two
Aug 29, 1986
45 Wn. App. 1004 (Wash. Ct. App. 1986)

In Linsley v. State, 88 Fla. 135, 101 So. 273, the Supreme Court said: "The taking of human life is neither justifiable or excusable where one fires the fatal shot or strikes the fatal blow after danger of death or great bodily harm to him from the deceased's attack has passed."

Summary of this case from State v. Wade
Case details for

State v. Linsley

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ROBERT MICHAEL LINSLEY, Appellant

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two

Date published: Aug 29, 1986

Citations

45 Wn. App. 1004 (Wash. Ct. App. 1986)
45 Wash. App. 1004

Citing Cases

State v. Smith

" In fact "the rule is general, with but few exceptions, if any, that the testimony of jurors will not be…

State v. Ramirez

But this general rule is subject to this qualification, that affidavits of jurors may be received, for the…

17 Citing Cases