From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Holden

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 2004
359 N.C. 60 (N.C. 2004)

Opinion

No. 574PA03

Filed 7 October 2004

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 160 N.C. App. 503, 586 S.E.2d 513 (2003), setting aside judgments entered upon defendant's conviction of two counts of first-degree statutory rape of a child under thirteen years of age by Judge Jerry R. Tillett on 16 January 2002 in Superior Court, Gates County, and awarding defendant a new trial. Heard in the Supreme Court on 14 September 2004.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant. Rudolph A. Ashton, III and Kirby H. Smith, III for defendant-appellee. Thomas F. Loflin, III and Seth H. Jaffe, Managing Attorney, on behalf of American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation, Inc., amicus curiae.


The members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

At the time this case was heard and decided, the Court consisted of only six members, due to the retirement of Associate Justice Orr on 31 July 2004.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Holden

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 2004
359 N.C. 60 (N.C. 2004)
Case details for

State v. Holden

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MICHAEL KEITH HOLDEN

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 2004

Citations

359 N.C. 60 (N.C. 2004)
602 S.E.2d 360

Citing Cases

State v. Lawrence

However, our Court has held that a defendant cannot waive his right to raise a jury unanimity issue on…

State v. Braxton

When asked if there were any problems with the verdict sheets, defense counsel replied “No, sir," and when…