From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Haizlip

COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA
Jul 5, 2016
790 S.E.2d 754 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

concluding there was sufficient evidence of the defendant’s reckless driving where the State presented evidence the defendant, inter alia, "accelerated through a yield sign forcing another driver to apply his brakes to avoid colliding with" the defendant

Summary of this case from State v. Carpio
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. COA15–886.

07-05-2016

STATE of North Carolina v. Pamela Marie HAIZLIP.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by J. Aldean Webster, III, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by Jillian C. Katz and Benjamin Dowling–Sendor, Assistant Appellate Defenders, for defendant-appellant.

DAVIS, Judge.

Case Reported Without Published Opinion

No Prejudicial Error.

Summaries of

State v. Haizlip

COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA
Jul 5, 2016
790 S.E.2d 754 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016)

concluding there was sufficient evidence of the defendant’s reckless driving where the State presented evidence the defendant, inter alia, "accelerated through a yield sign forcing another driver to apply his brakes to avoid colliding with" the defendant

Summary of this case from State v. Carpio
Case details for

State v. Haizlip

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. PAMELA MARIE HAIZLIP

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Jul 5, 2016

Citations

790 S.E.2d 754 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

State v. Carpio

State v. Cheeks, 267 N.C. App. 579, 612-13, 833 S.E.2d 660, 682 (2019) (citation and internal quotation marks…

1 Citing Cases