From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Grimes

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Feb 19, 2002
111 Wn. App. 544 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In State v. Grimes, 111 Wash.App. 544, 46 P.3d 801 (2002), review denied, 148 Wash.2d 1002, 60 P.3d 1211 (2003), the trial court allowed evidence of Grimes's intent at the time of the theft but excluded evidence of later repayment.

Summary of this case from State v. Cuthbert
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Nos. 45289-4-I c/w 46534-1-I.

Filed: February 19, 2002.

The opinion in the above captioned case, which appeared in the advance sheets at 110 Wn. App. 272-82, has been omitted from this volume because of an amendment of the opinion made by an order of the Court of Appeals dated May 2, 2002. The opinion, as modified, appears at 111 Wn. App. 544.

THE NEXT PAGE IS NUMBERED 283.

Summaries of

State v. Grimes

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Feb 19, 2002
111 Wn. App. 544 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002)

In State v. Grimes, 111 Wash.App. 544, 46 P.3d 801 (2002), review denied, 148 Wash.2d 1002, 60 P.3d 1211 (2003), the trial court allowed evidence of Grimes's intent at the time of the theft but excluded evidence of later repayment.

Summary of this case from State v. Cuthbert
Case details for

State v. Grimes

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent , v. TED J. GRIMES, Appellant

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One

Date published: Feb 19, 2002

Citations

111 Wn. App. 544 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002)
111 Wn. App. 544
110 Wash. App. 272
111 Wash. App. 544

Citing Cases

State v. Kahr

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the evidence of repayment. In excluding this…

State v. Cuthbert

In a similar vein, the misappropriation of funds as an advance on a caregiver fee a court later determines to…

7 Citing Cases