From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Fisher

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 8, 1991
578 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

holding that bond estreature proper when defendant entered plea of guilty, sentencing continued to a later date, and defendant did not appear for sentencing

Summary of this case from Broward Cty. v. B B Bail Bonds

Opinion

No. 90-01316.

March 27, 1991. Rehearing Denied May 8, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Susan F. Schaeffer, J.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anne Y. Swing, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

William C. Gregg, III of William C. Gregg, III Chartered, Clearwater, for appellee.


The state appeals an order setting aside a bond estreature. We reverse.

The trial judge was persuaded that this court's decision in American Druggists' Insurance Company v. State, 410 So.2d 627 (Fla.2d DCA 1982), and the first district's decision in Accredited Surety and Casualty Company, Inc. v. State, 318 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), had been rendered inapplicable by amendments in 1980 and 1986 to section 903.31, Florida Statutes. We disagree and find that both American Druggists' and Accredited Surety are both still applicable interpretations of section 903.31, Florida Statutes (1987).

In this case, Accredited Surety and Casualty Company bonded the defendant, Richard Fisher, for his appearance on charges of two counts of capital sexual battery. Fisher subsequently pled guilty to amended counts of attempted sexual battery. Adjudication was withheld until sentencing, which was continued until a later date, and Fisher was continued on the bond. No presentence investigation was requested as there was an agreed-upon plea-bargained sentence. Fisher failed to appear for sentencing and his bond was ordered estreated. Subsequently, upon motion for rehearing, the bond estreature was set aside by the trial judge who determined that section 903.31 precluded any liability on Fisher's original appearance bond because it could not be construed to guarantee "deferred sentences." In this case, Fisher had not received a "deferred sentence" but had had his sentencing deferred until a later sentencing hearing. Since there had been no adjudication of guilt and no sentence imposed, the bond had not been satisfied or cancelled and was subject to estreature for Fisher's failure to appear for sentencing.

Reversed and remanded for treatment consistent with this opinion.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Fisher

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 8, 1991
578 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

holding that bond estreature proper when defendant entered plea of guilty, sentencing continued to a later date, and defendant did not appear for sentencing

Summary of this case from Broward Cty. v. B B Bail Bonds

In State v. Fisher, 578 So.2d 746 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), the court held that American Druggists' and Accredited Surety survived the 1986 amendment.

Summary of this case from Rosenberg Bail Bonds v. Orange Cty
Case details for

State v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. RICHARD M. FISHER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 8, 1991

Citations

578 So. 2d 746 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Polakoff Bail Bonds v. Orange County

617 So.2d at 379. Citing Battles v. State, 595 So.2d 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) and State v. Fisher, 578 So.2d…

Rosenberg Bail Bonds v. Orange Cty

Ch. 80-151, § 12. Additional changes have been made that are not material to the instant case, and the…