From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. FANALOUS ET AL

Supreme Court of Utah
Oct 11, 1940
99 Utah 322 (Utah 1940)

Summary

In State v. Fanalous, 99 Utah 322, 106 P.2d 163 (1940) (per curiam), the Utah Supreme Court held that when a defendant dies during the pendency of an appeal in a criminal case, "the prosecution or the criminal action does not survive, but, on the death of the appellant pending the appeal, the prosecution abates in toto, whatever be the judgment appealed from."

Summary of this case from State v. Christensen

Opinion

No. 6183.

Decided October 11, 1940.

1. CRIMINAL LAW. The purpose of a criminal action is to punish the defendant in person, and upon the death of the defendant the action must necessarily abate. 2. CRIMINAL LAW. Where accused was convicted of arson in the second degree and appeal was duly taken and case set for hearing, but accused died before the date set for hearing, the action abated. Rev.St. 1933, 103-6-2.

Appeal from District Court, Second District, Weber County; Lester A. Wade, Judge.

Criminal proceeding by the State of Utah against Jim Fanalous and another. The named defendant was convicted of arson in the second degree and he appealed, but died pending the appeal.

Action abated.

George C. Buckle, of Ogden, for appellant.

Joseph Chez, Atty. Gen., and Wade M. Johnson, of Ogden, for respondent.


Jim Fanalous was convicted in the District Court of Weber County, State of Utah, of the crime of arson in the second degree, as defined by Sec. 103-6-2, R.S.U. 1933. Sentence was imposed. An appeal was duly taken to this Court. Errors were assigned upon the record. The case was set for hearing upon the September calendar for the ninth day of September, 1940. On the second day of September, 1940, the appellant died at the Dee Hospital in Ogden, Utah.

The sole question before the court is: Has the appeal abated?

In the case of March v. State, 5 Tex. App. 450[ 5 Tex.Crim. 450], at page 456, the Texas court, acting upon a similar case stated:

"We are of opinion, then, that in a criminal prosecution, when the accused has taken an appeal in the manner prescribed by law, the proceeding is still pending and undetermined until the appeal shall have been decided; and that in case the appellant die whilst the appeal is pending and undetermined, the prosecution or the criminal action does not survive, but, on the death of the appellant pending the appeal, the prosecution abates in toto, whatever be the judgment appealed from."

The purpose of a criminal action is to punish the defendant in person, and upon the death of the defendant the action must necessarily abate. O'Sullivan v. People, 144 Ill. 604, 32 N.E. 192, 20 L.R.A. 143; Herrington v. State, 53 Ga. 552; State v. Martin, 30 Or. 108, 47 P. 196; 1, 2 Overland Cotton Mill Co. et al. v People, 32 Colo. 263, 75 P. 924, 105 Am.St.Rep. 74; State v. Furth, 82, Wash. 665, 144 P. 907.

The action has abated. The cause is closed.


Summaries of

STATE v. FANALOUS ET AL

Supreme Court of Utah
Oct 11, 1940
99 Utah 322 (Utah 1940)

In State v. Fanalous, 99 Utah 322, 106 P.2d 163 (1940) (per curiam), the Utah Supreme Court held that when a defendant dies during the pendency of an appeal in a criminal case, "the prosecution or the criminal action does not survive, but, on the death of the appellant pending the appeal, the prosecution abates in toto, whatever be the judgment appealed from."

Summary of this case from State v. Christensen
Case details for

STATE v. FANALOUS ET AL

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. FANALOUS et al

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Oct 11, 1940

Citations

99 Utah 322 (Utah 1940)
106 P.2d 163

Citing Cases

State v. Lawrence

However, in a criminal prosecution the object of which is to [2] enforce the criminal law and to punish the…

State v. Christensen

We must first determine whether defendant's death has mooted all or part of the judgment against defendant.…