From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Duntz

Review Division Of The Superior Court
Jan 4, 1965
208 A.2d 761 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1965)

Opinion

The defendant's reformatory sentence of not more than two years nor less than nine months for using a motor vehicle without the owner's permission was fair and must stand. His extensive record of antisocial behavior showed that he will need strong supervision.

Decided January 4, 1965

Application for review of sentence imposed by the Circuit Court in the eighteenth circuit (No. CR 18-3152). Sentence confirmed.

Richard D. Duntz, the defendant, pro se.

Frank H. Finch, assistant prosecuting attorney, for the state.


This defendant, age sixteen, pleaded guilty to an information charging him with the crime of taking a motor vehicle without the owner's permission, § 14-229 of the General Statutes, which provides for a maximum fine of $1000, one year in jail, or both. He was sentenced to an indeterminate term to the reformatory at Cheshire, which sentence amounts to a term of not more than two years nor less than nine months for good behavior.

This defendant has a most extensive record for antisocial behavior dating back to April, 1957. Without enumerating the record in detail, it clearly indicates a boy most difficult to handle, complicated by an aggressive sex problem. John P. Atchley, psychiatrist, states that defendant is completely out of hand and should receive strong supervision. He felt this boy is potentially dangerous to society. The record reveals that while at Cheshire he was placed on report at least eight times, one of which was for setting a fire at his place of work.


Summaries of

State v. Duntz

Review Division Of The Superior Court
Jan 4, 1965
208 A.2d 761 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1965)
Case details for

State v. Duntz

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RICHARD D. DUNTZ

Court:Review Division Of The Superior Court

Date published: Jan 4, 1965

Citations

208 A.2d 761 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1965)
208 A.2d 761

Citing Cases

State v. Phillips

It is worthy of note that the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court has taken a similar approach to cases…

Pointer v. CL Connecticut Restaurant

In Valante v. Valante, 180 Conn. 528, 532-33, 429 A.2d 964 (1980), our Supreme Court held that, although the…