From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cantino

Review Division Of The Superior Court
Jun 17, 1971
281 A.2d 462 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1971)

Opinion

The Review Division of the Superior Court has no jurisdiction to review a sentence on an application filed later than thirty days after imposition of sentence. Consequently, the Division could not consider the defendant's application, filed after his sentence was made effective following revocation of probation.

Decided June 17, 1971

Application for review of sentence imposed by the Superior Court in New Haven County at Waterbury (No. 9300). Application dismissed.

Timothy C. Moynahan, of Waterbury, for the defendant.

Walter H. Scanlon, assistant state's attorney, for the state.


The defendant was originally sentenced on December 19, 1967, execution was suspended and he was put on probation for two years. On May 6, 1969, his probation was ordered to continue to December 19, 1970, after he was presented for violation of probation. On October 19, 1970, a bench warrant was ordered for violation of probation, and on October 22, 1970, the probation was revoked and the previous sentence was made effective. The application for review of sentence was dated November 18, 1970, and was filed on November 19, 1970. The sentence he is presently serving was imposed on December 19, 1967. The application for review was obviously filed more than thirty days after that sentence. The Review Division has no jurisdiction to consider an application filed beyond the statutory limit of thirty days. General Statutes § 51-195; State v. Scates, 22 Conn. Sup. 270.


Summaries of

State v. Cantino

Review Division Of The Superior Court
Jun 17, 1971
281 A.2d 462 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1971)
Case details for

State v. Cantino

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. PAUL CANTINO

Court:Review Division Of The Superior Court

Date published: Jun 17, 1971

Citations

281 A.2d 462 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1971)
29 Conn. Supp. 236

Citing Cases

State v. Jones

This division has consistently held that unless the application for review of sentence is filed within thirty…

State v. Jenkins

Because the application for review was not filed within the time limited by statute, this division has no…