From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cannon

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 2, 2018
809 S.E.2d 567 (N.C. 2018)

Summary

disavowing our "taking of judicial notice of the prevalence of Wal-Mart stores in Gastonia and in the area between Gastonia and Denver, as well as of the 'ubiquitous nature of Wal-Mart stores'"

Summary of this case from State v. Littlejohn

Opinion

No. 276A17

03-02-2018

STATE of North Carolina v. Gary William CANNON

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Thomas J. Campbell, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State. William D. Spence, Kinston, for defendant-appellant.


Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Thomas J. Campbell, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.

William D. Spence, Kinston, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. However, we specifically disavow that court's taking of judicial notice of the prevalence of Wal-Mart stores in Gastonia and in the area between Gastonia and Denver, as well as of the "ubiquitous nature of Wal-Mart stores." State v. Cannon , –––N.C. App. ––––, ––––, 804 S.E.2d 199, 202 (2017).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Cannon

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 2, 2018
809 S.E.2d 567 (N.C. 2018)

disavowing our "taking of judicial notice of the prevalence of Wal-Mart stores in Gastonia and in the area between Gastonia and Denver, as well as of the 'ubiquitous nature of Wal-Mart stores'"

Summary of this case from State v. Littlejohn
Case details for

State v. Cannon

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. Gary William CANNON

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Mar 2, 2018

Citations

809 S.E.2d 567 (N.C. 2018)

Citing Cases

State v. Littlejohn

Defendant's brief raises technological issues that are not a part of the record and would strain our concepts…