From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Callahan

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 29, 1996
671 So. 2d 903 (La. 1996)

Summary

In State v. Callahan, 95-1331 (La. 3/29/96), 671 So.2d 903, the Louisiana Supreme Court found that La.R.S. 14:27 provides only a maximum sentence for a conviction for an attempt to commit a crime.

Summary of this case from State v. Howard

Opinion

No. 95-K-1331

March 29, 1996

IN RE: Callahan, William Matthew; — Defendant(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of Bossier 26th Judicial District Court Div. "A" Number 70,495; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Number 26811-KA.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT, PARISH OF BOSSIER


Granted in part. See per curiam. Otherwise, denied.

MARCUS, J. dissents and assigns reasons.


The application is granted in part.

Relator was convicted of attempted possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and was sentenced to two and one-half years imprisonment, which the trial court noted was the statutory minimum sentence for that crime.

The sentencing range for a conviction of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute is five to thirty years. When the conviction is for attempt, La.Rev.Stat. 14:27D(3) provides:

D. Whoever attempts to commit any crime shall be punished as follows:

. . .

(3) In all other cases he shall be fined or imprisoned or both, in the same manner as for the offense attempted; such fine or imprisonment shall not exceed one-half of the largest fine, or one-half of the longest term of imprisonment prescribed for the offense so attempted, or both. (emphasis added).

La.Rev.Stat. 14:27D(3) by its terms provides only amaximum sentence for a conviction of attempting to commit a crime. There is no express statutory minimum sentence for being convicted of an attempt, and principles of lenity require that the statute be strictly construed. State v. Jaye, 383 So.2d 1261 (La. 1980); State v. Broussard, 217 La. 90, 46 So.2d 48 (1950).

Accordingly, relator's sentence is vacated, and this case is remanded to the district court for resentencing. In all other respects, the application is denied.

MARCUS, J. dissents:

La.R.S. 14:27 D (3) provides that "[i]n all cases he shall be . . . imprisoned . . . in the same manner as for the offense attempted." [Emphasis added.] In my opinion, in the same manner refers to the minimum sentence requirement for the offense attempted. The second sentence provides that imprisonment shall not exceed one-half of the longest term of imprisonment for the offense attempted. This refers to the maximum sentence for the offense attempted. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.


Summaries of

State v. Callahan

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 29, 1996
671 So. 2d 903 (La. 1996)

In State v. Callahan, 95-1331 (La. 3/29/96), 671 So.2d 903, the Louisiana Supreme Court found that La.R.S. 14:27 provides only a maximum sentence for a conviction for an attempt to commit a crime.

Summary of this case from State v. Howard

In State v. Callahan, 95-1331 (La. 3/29/96), 671 So.2d 903 (per curiam), the Supreme Court said there is no minimum sentence for the crime of attempted possession with intent to distribute marijuana.

Summary of this case from State v. Odle

In State v. Callahan, 95-1331 (La. 3/29/96), 671 So.2d 903 (per curiam), the Supreme Court said there is no minimum sentence for the crime of attempted possession with intent to distribute marijuana.

Summary of this case from State v. Thomas
Case details for

State v. Callahan

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA vs. WILLIAM MATTHEW CALLAHAN

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Mar 29, 1996

Citations

671 So. 2d 903 (La. 1996)

Citing Cases

State v. Phayarath

The supreme court has found this language requires no minimum penalty provision. State v. Callahan, 95-1331…

State v. Odle

See State v. O'Blanc, 346 So.2d 686, 690 (La. 1977). In State v. Callahan, 95-1331 (La. 3/29/96), 671 So.2d…