From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Burroughs

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 17, 1980
271 S.E.2d 629 (Ga. 1980)

Summary

In State v. Burroughs, 246 Ga. 393, 394 (271 S.E.2d 629) (1980), the court held that a person convicted of a greater offense cannot thereafter be convicted in a separate trial for the lesser included offense if both convictions are based on proof of the same facts, and that the reverse is also true, i.e., a conviction of a lesser included offense bars subsequent trial on the greater offense.

Summary of this case from Bailey v. State

Opinion

34916.

ARGUED JUNE 12, 1979.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1980.

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia — 149 Ga. App. 183 ( 254 S.E.2d 144) (1979).

Hinson McAuliffe, Solicitor, Charles R. Hadaway, Assistant Solicitor, for appellant.

Steve W. Reighard, for appellee.

Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Charles R. Hadaway, Assistant District Attorney, amicus curiae.


The decision of this court in State v. Burroughs, 244 Ga. 288 ( 260 S.E.2d 5) (1979), has been vacated and the case has been remanded to this court for further consideration in light of Illinois v. Vitale, 447 U.S. ___ (100 SC ___, 65 L.Ed.2d 228) (1980).

Vitale struck two small children with his automobile. He first was convicted for failing to reduce speed to avoid an accident and thereafter was charged with two counts of involuntary manslaughter. The Supreme Court of the United States held, insofar as is critical to a disposition of this case, that "if in the pending manslaughter prosecution Illinois relies on and proves a failure to slow to avoid an accident as the reckless act necessary to prove manslaughter, Vitale would have a substantial claim of double jeopardy under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution." 65 L.Ed.2d 228. The dissenters felt that in those circumstances Vitale's double jeopardy claim "would not merely be `substantial'; it would be dispositive." Id.

In the present case, Burroughs was convicted twice; once for disorderly conduct, the greater offense, in municipal court; later for simple battery, the lesser-included offense, in state court. The convictions were based on proof of the same facts: that on one occasion he struck and kicked a policeman. The Vitale case precludes this result. As the court held in Vitale, the double jeopardy clause is operative under In re Nielsen, 131 U.S. 176 (1889), so that "a person who has been convicted of a crime having several elements included in it may not subsequently be tried for a lesser-included offense — an offense consisting solely of one or more of the elements of the crime for which he has already been convicted." 65 L.Ed.2d 228. The Court in Vitale further held that under Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 ( 97 S.C. 2221, 53 L.Ed.2d 187) (1977), "the reverse is also true; a conviction on a lesser-included offense bars subsequent trial on the greater offense." 65 L.Ed.2d 228.

This court adopts Justice Hill's views as stated in his dissent in State v. Burroughs, 244 Ga. 288, 291, supra. Accordingly, Burroughs' conviction for simple battery should be reversed. The judgment of the Court of Appeals reversing his second conviction is affirmed. Burroughs may not be retried for simple battery based upon the striking and kicking incident for which he was convicted of disorderly conduct.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED JUNE 12, 1979 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1980.


Summaries of

State v. Burroughs

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 17, 1980
271 S.E.2d 629 (Ga. 1980)

In State v. Burroughs, 246 Ga. 393, 394 (271 S.E.2d 629) (1980), the court held that a person convicted of a greater offense cannot thereafter be convicted in a separate trial for the lesser included offense if both convictions are based on proof of the same facts, and that the reverse is also true, i.e., a conviction of a lesser included offense bars subsequent trial on the greater offense.

Summary of this case from Bailey v. State
Case details for

State v. Burroughs

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE v. BURROUGHS

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 17, 1980

Citations

271 S.E.2d 629 (Ga. 1980)
271 S.E.2d 629

Citing Cases

Henderson v. State

The charges of simple battery and criminal damage to property in the second degree were based on the same…

Gerisch v. Meadows

(Punctuation omitted.) State v. Burroughs, 246 Ga. 393, 394 ( 271 SE2d 629) (1980). See also Brown v. Ohio,…