From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Barnes

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Aug 29, 2011
72 So. 3d 938 (La. Ct. App. 2011)

Summary

In Barnes, the fourth circuit stated "that it is an abuse of the trial court's discretion to deny a motion for continuance when both sides in a criminal case agree to a continuance of trial."

Summary of this case from State v. Dean

Opinion

No. 2011–K–1185.

08-29-2011

STATE of Louisiana v. Kenneth BARNES.

Patrick Canton McGinity, Metairie, LA, Donald Anthony Sauviac, Jr., New Orleans, LA, for Relator, Kenneth Barnes. Leon A. Cannizzaro, Jr., District Attorney, Felicity Strachan, Assistant District Attorney, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent, State of Louisiana.


Patrick Canton McGinity, Metairie, LA, Donald Anthony Sauviac, Jr., New Orleans, LA, for Relator, Kenneth Barnes.

Leon A. Cannizzaro, Jr., District Attorney, Felicity Strachan, Assistant District Attorney, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent, State of Louisiana.

(Court composed of Judge MICHAEL E. KIRBY, Judge MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge PAUL A. BONIN ).

MICHAEL E. KIRBY, Judge.

The defendant, Kenneth Barnes, seeks this Court's review of the trial court's denial of his motion for continuance of trial scheduled for September 1, 2011. The State of Louisiana joined in the defendant's motion, and has filed its own writ application seeking review of the trial court's denial of the motion in 2011–K–1186.

This Court has previously found, in unpublished writ dispositions, that it is an abuse of the trial court's discretion to deny a motion for continuance when both sides in a criminal case agree to a continuance of trial. La.C.Cr.P. art. 707 ; State v. Lee, 11–1176, unpub. (La.App. 4 Cir. 8/25/11); State v. Richardson, 09–0953, unpub. (La.App. 4 Cir. 7/20/09); State v. King, 11–0243, unpub. (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/18/11); State v. Terry, 11–0245, unpub. (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/18/11). In the instant case, the trial court, on August 26, 2011, denied the joint motion for continuance of the trial scheduled for September 1, 2011. We find that this was an abuse of the trial court's discretion. Accordingly, we grant the defendant's writ application and reverse the trial court judgment denying the continuance. We hereby grant the continuance of the September 1, 2011 trial date. Because of our decision, the request for a stay is moot.

WRIT GRANTED; JUDGMENT REVERSED


Summaries of

State v. Barnes

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
Aug 29, 2011
72 So. 3d 938 (La. Ct. App. 2011)

In Barnes, the fourth circuit stated "that it is an abuse of the trial court's discretion to deny a motion for continuance when both sides in a criminal case agree to a continuance of trial."

Summary of this case from State v. Dean
Case details for

State v. Barnes

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. KENNETH BARNES

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 29, 2011

Citations

72 So. 3d 938 (La. Ct. App. 2011)
72 So. 3d 939

Citing Cases

State v. Perrilloux

I concur to point out that I maintain the position taken in my dissent in State v. Darwin Bethune, 18-147…

State v. King

On the showing made, we find that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the joint motion to…