From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Missik v. Youngstown

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 9, 1992
602 N.E.2d 633 (Ohio 1992)

Summary

In Missik, the claimant, George Missik, suffered three industrial injuries while working for the City of Youngstown: (1) claim number PE626746—"Bilateral sacroiliac injury," (2) claim number PEL4593—"Neck and shoulder," and (3) claim number PEL3212—"Injured back and left side."

Summary of this case from State ex rel. Ohio Presbyterian Ret. Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm'n of Ohio

Opinion

No. 92-155

Submitted October 13, 1992 —

Decided December 9, 1992.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 91AP-83.

Appellant-claimant, George Missik, suffered three injuries while working for the city of Youngstown: (1) claim number PE626746 — "Bilateral sacroiliac injury," (2) claim number PEL4593 — "Neck and shoulder," and (3) claim number PEL3212 — "Injured back and left side." Claimant did not return to work after the last injury.

In 1987, claimant sought permanent total disability compensation, listing only PEL3212 and PEL4593 on his application. Claimant was examined on the Industrial Commission's behalf by Dr. William G. Kraus, who confined his examination and discussion to the injuries sustained in those two claims (except for referring to the other injury in giving the claimant's history). He concluded:

"It is my present opinion that this claimant is now permanently and totally impaired insofar as the performance of any sustained remunerative employment on the basis of the allowed conditions in Claim Nos. PEL-4593 and PEL-3212, and, within reasonable medical probability, I do not believe that he can be rehabilitated."

The commission granted permanent total disability compensation, with the order specifying "that the cost of this award be allocated 100% to claim number PEL-3212."

Claimant eventually sought permanent partial disability compensation in claim numbers PE626746 and PEL4593. A commission district hearing officer dismissed both applications based on claimant's prior permanent total disability award. Reconsideration was denied in both claims.

Claimant sought a writ of mandamus in the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, claiming that the commission had abused its discretion in dismissing his application for compensation for permanent partial disability. The court of appeals disagreed, relying on Dr. Kraus's narrative. Because that report attributed claimant's disability to both upper and lower back conditions, the court reasoned that "there was no evidence to support a theory that the commission intended to attribute the entire permanent total disability solely to the last claim number."

This cause is now before this court upon an appeal as of right.

Green, Haines, Sgambati, Murphy Macala Co., L.P.A., Ronald E. Slipski and Steven L. Paulson, for appellant. Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Dennis L. Hufstader, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.


Pursuant to our decision in State ex rel. Litten v. Indus. Comm. (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 178, 602 N.E.2d 624, we find that the commission's permanent total disability finding, by attributing the award's costs exclusively to PEL3212, did not encompass PEL4593 and PE626746. We thus find that the commission abused its discretion in dismissing claimant's permanent partial disability application in PEL4593. However, because PEL3212 and PE626746 both involve back injuries, the commission did not err in dismissing claimant's permanent partial disability application in the latter claim. State ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Indus. Comm. (1980), 62 Ohio St.2d 147, 16 O.O.3d 166, 404 N.E.2d 141.

We thus affirm that portion of the appellate judgment that found no abuse of discretion by the commission in dismissing claimant's permanent partial disability application in PE626746. The balance of the judgment is reversed. We order the commission to consider the merits of the application in PEL4593.

Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part and writ granted in part.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

HOLMES, J., dissents.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Missik v. Youngstown

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 9, 1992
602 N.E.2d 633 (Ohio 1992)

In Missik, the claimant, George Missik, suffered three industrial injuries while working for the City of Youngstown: (1) claim number PE626746—"Bilateral sacroiliac injury," (2) claim number PEL4593—"Neck and shoulder," and (3) claim number PEL3212—"Injured back and left side."

Summary of this case from State ex rel. Ohio Presbyterian Ret. Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm'n of Ohio
Case details for

State ex Rel. Missik v. Youngstown

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE EX REL. MISSIK, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 9, 1992

Citations

602 N.E.2d 633 (Ohio 1992)
602 N.E.2d 633

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Ohio Univ. v. Indus. Comm'n of Ohio

Instead, the Staff Hearing Officer should have analyzed whether the request for permanent partial disability…

State ex rel. Ohio Presbyterian Ret. Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm'n of Ohio

The hearing officer relied in part on the commission's analysis of the same issue in claim No. 02–354357…