From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Luedtke v. Bertrand

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
May 28, 1999
226 Wis. 2d 271 (Wis. 1999)

Opinion

No. 97-3238-W.

Oral argument April 8, 1999.

Decided May 28, 1999.

REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed.

For the respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Jody J. Schmelzer, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was Charles D. Hoornstra, assistant attorney general and James D. Doyle, attorney general.

For the petitioner there was a brief by Stephen M. Compton and Brennan, Steil, Basting MacDougall, S.C., Janesville and oral argument by Stephen M. Compton.


(Affirming 220 Wis.2d 574, 583 N.W.2d 858 (Ct.App. 1998)


The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the published decision of the court of appeals, State ex rel. Luedtke v. Bertrand, 220 Wis.2d 574, 583 N.W.2d 858 (Ct.App. 1998). Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson and Justices Ann Walsh Bradley and David T. Prosser would affirm; Justices Donald W. Steinmetz, William A. Bablitch and N. Patrick Crooks would reverse. Justice Jon P. Wilcox withdrew from participation.

¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

By the Court. — The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Luedtke v. Bertrand

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
May 28, 1999
226 Wis. 2d 271 (Wis. 1999)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Luedtke v. Bertrand

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. JAMES D. LUEDTKE, PETITIONER, v. DANIEL…

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: May 28, 1999

Citations

226 Wis. 2d 271 (Wis. 1999)
594 N.W.2d 370

Citing Cases

Smith v. Kleynerman

77. State ex rel. Luedtke v. Bertrand , 226 Wis.2d 271, 594 N.W.2d 370 (1999) (on petition for…

Griswold v. Tisdale

¶20 "[T]he fee waiver statute's standard for deciding whether a proposed action states a claim is the same…