From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Standard Statistics Co., Inc. v. Davis

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Dec 30, 1942
317 Ill. App. 377 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)

Summary

In Standard Statistics Co. v. Davis (1942), 317 Ill. App. 377, 45 N.E.2d 1005, the Appellate Court reversed where a motion had not been ruled upon.

Summary of this case from Schroeder v. Busenhart

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,884. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed December 30, 1942

DEFAULTS, § 109when order vacating judgment is premature. Where plaintiff filed motion to strike defendant's verified motion to vacate default judgment on promissory note, and trial court entered order vacating judgment without first passing upon plaintiff's motion to strike, such action on part of trial court constituted error, and order so entered would be reversed and cause remanded.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. OSCAR S. CAPLAN, Judge, presiding.

Judgement order of April 30, 1941, reversed in toto and cause remanded with directions. Heard in the second division, first district, this court at the October term, 1941.

Jaffe Green, for appellant;

Jacob H. Jaffe and David H. Kraft, of counsel;

Charles H. Borden, for appellee.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed December 30, 1942.


Summaries of

Standard Statistics Co., Inc. v. Davis

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Dec 30, 1942
317 Ill. App. 377 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)

In Standard Statistics Co. v. Davis (1942), 317 Ill. App. 377, 45 N.E.2d 1005, the Appellate Court reversed where a motion had not been ruled upon.

Summary of this case from Schroeder v. Busenhart
Case details for

Standard Statistics Co., Inc. v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:Standard Statistics Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Charles T. Davis, Appellee

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Dec 30, 1942

Citations

317 Ill. App. 377 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
45 N.E.2d 1005

Citing Cases

Schroeder v. Busenhart

Plaintiffs also raise a question of lack of jurisdiction on the part of the trial court to allow an amendment…