From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Staller v. Staller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 30, 1941
21 A.2d 16 (Pa. 1941)

Summary

adopting the opinion of the Superior Court

Summary of this case from Berwick Industries v. W.C.A.B

Opinion

May 26, 1941.

June 30, 1941.

Before SCHAFFER, C. J., MAXEY, DREW, LINN, STERN, PATTERSON and PARKER, JJ.

Appeal, No. 211, Jan. T., 1941, from decree of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1940, No. 320, affirming judgment of C. P. No. 6, Phila. Co., June T., 1940, No. 3863, in case of Robert E. Staller v. P. B. Staller and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Second Injury Reserve Account. Judgment affirmed.

Appeal by defendants from award of Workmen's Compensation Board.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court, reported in 144 Pa. Super. 83.

Judgment entered against defendants, opinion by FLOOD, J. Commonwealth appealed to the Superior Court which affirmed the judgment of the court below. Appeal by Commonwealth to Supreme Court allowed.

S. H. Torchia, with him Ralph H. Behney, M. Louise Rutherford, Deputy Attorney General, and Claude T. Reno, Attorney General, for appellants.

John B. Martin, Joseph Head, Jr., and Duane, Morris Heckscher, for appellee, were not heard.


Affirmed on the opinion of the Superior Court.


Summaries of

Staller v. Staller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 30, 1941
21 A.2d 16 (Pa. 1941)

adopting the opinion of the Superior Court

Summary of this case from Berwick Industries v. W.C.A.B
Case details for

Staller v. Staller

Case Details

Full title:Staller v. Staller et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 30, 1941

Citations

21 A.2d 16 (Pa. 1941)
21 A.2d 16

Citing Cases

Berwick Industries v. W.C.A.B

In a 1941 decision, this Court expressly limited the holding of Paolis to "the particular facts of that…

Whitmoyer v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

Seeid. Cases interpreting section 308 bear out this conclusion. For example, in Staller v. Staller , 343 Pa.…