In Staal v. Grand St. Newtown R.R. Co. (107 N.Y. 625) the plaintiff claimed damages for pecuniary loss resulting from diminution in his ability to labor in the future.
Summary of this case from Page v. Delaware Hudson Canal Co.Argued July 1, 1887
Decided October 11, 1887
Albert G. McDonald for appellant.
A. Simis, Jr. for respondent.
EARL, J., reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur, except RUGER, Ch. J., and DANFORTH, J., dissenting.
Judgment reversed.
In Staal v. Grand St. Newtown R.R. Co. (107 N.Y. 625) the plaintiff claimed damages for pecuniary loss resulting from diminution in his ability to labor in the future.
Summary of this case from Page v. Delaware Hudson Canal Co.Full title:REMMAR STAAL, Respondent, v . THE GRAND STREET AND NEWTOWN RAILROAD…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 11, 1887
And, as it is impossible to say how much the jury awarded for these services and how much for the plaintiff's…
Pickett v. Town of West Monroe" The request was refused and the defendant excepted. It was held that there was no proof as to the value of…