From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Souyoutzis v. M/V Georgios K

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 16, 1976
525 F.2d 1197 (5th Cir. 1976)

Summary

holding that the United States Marshal properly refused to execute a warrant of attachment without prepayment of costs to be incurred

Summary of this case from EFFJOHN INTERNATIONAL CRUISE HOLDINGS v. M/V ENCHANTED ISLE

Opinion

No. 75-1924.

January 16, 1976.

Hillord H. Hinson, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

Edward B. McDonough, Jr., U.S. Atty., Jack Shepherd, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., Morton Hollander, Mark Mutterperl, Leonard Schaitmann, Appellate Section, Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Before GODBOLD, DYER and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.


Without prepayment of costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1916, Souyoutzis filed a suit in rem for wages against the M/V Georgios K. Relying on 28 U.S.C.A. § 1921, the Marshal refused to execute the warrant of attachment without a deposit for costs to be incurred. The district court denied relief. We affirm for the reasons explicated in Araya v. McLelland, 5 Cir. 1976, 525 F.2d 1194.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Souyoutzis v. M/V Georgios K

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 16, 1976
525 F.2d 1197 (5th Cir. 1976)

holding that the United States Marshal properly refused to execute a warrant of attachment without prepayment of costs to be incurred

Summary of this case from EFFJOHN INTERNATIONAL CRUISE HOLDINGS v. M/V ENCHANTED ISLE
Case details for

Souyoutzis v. M/V Georgios K

Case Details

Full title:STAMATIS SOUYOUTZIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. M/V GEORGIOS K, HER ENGINES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jan 16, 1976

Citations

525 F.2d 1197 (5th Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

Setera v. F/V Olympic, Official No. 516728

The Fifth Circuit, however, refused to follow Thielebeule, and held that the later statutory enactment should…

EFFJOHN INTERNATIONAL CRUISE HOLDINGS v. M/V ENCHANTED ISLE

00 fee covers the Marshal's costs of making service on the vessel, and the Marshal has advised the Court that…