Summary
holding that estoppel claim is improper where a pension plan and actuarial concerns are at issue
Summary of this case from Cataldo v. U.S. Steel Corp.Opinion
Case Number: 1:07cv645.
January 29, 2009
ORDER
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Black. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on November 26, 2008 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendations and defendants filed a response to the objections (Doc. 33).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendations should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to set aside the administrative decision (Doc. 17) is DENIED. Objections to Magistrate Judge's order (Doc. 27) are hereby DENIED AS MOOT. This case is hereby CLOSED.