From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sonnenberg v. Nolan Motors

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 1, 1942
2 Misc. 2d 185 (N.Y. App. Term 1942)

Opinion

July 1, 1942

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of The Bronx, CHRISTOPHER C. McGRATH, J.

Daniel J. Pinsky for appellant.

George H. Berman for George Sonnenberg, respondent.

Francis S. Bensel and Hancock Griffin, Jr., for Chrysler Corporation, Dodge Division, respondent.


The plaintiff by his contract having waived any implied warranty, any recovery must be based only on a breach of the uniform warranty made part of the agreement. (Personal Property Law, § 152; Plimpton v. Brown Bros. Co., 224 N.Y. 724; Lumbrazo v. Woodruff, 256 N.Y. 92, 96; Lee v. Industrial Laundry Mach. Co., 261 App. Div. 741; Sayeg v. Gloria Light Co., 236 App. Div. 761; 106 A.L.R. 1466.)

The order should be reversed, motion granted, with $30 costs to appellant against plaintiff to abide the event, and judgment vacated.

HAMMER, SHIENTAG and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Sonnenberg v. Nolan Motors

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 1, 1942
2 Misc. 2d 185 (N.Y. App. Term 1942)
Case details for

Sonnenberg v. Nolan Motors

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE SONNENBERG, Respondent, v. NOLAN MOTORS INC., Appellant, and…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1942

Citations

2 Misc. 2d 185 (N.Y. App. Term 1942)
36 N.Y.S.2d 549

Citing Cases

Broderick Haulage v. Mack-International

Plaintiff cannot claim nor be given the benefit of a warranty which it expressly waived. The disclaimer of…