From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sayeg v. Gloria Light Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

September, 1932.


Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for the defendant dismissing the complaint upon the merits, with costs. In our opinion, no warranty, either express or implied, could be established in this case because the contract itself expressly excludes all warranties. ( Bowser Co., Inc., v. McCormack, 230 App. Div. 303; Carleton v. Lombard, Ayres Co., 149 N.Y. 137.) Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent with this decision are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made in accordance herewith. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Sayeg v. Gloria Light Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Sayeg v. Gloria Light Company

Case Details

Full title:J. EMILE SAYEG, Respondent, v. GLORIA LIGHT COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1932

Citations

236 App. Div. 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

Sonnenberg v. Nolan Motors

The plaintiff by his contract having waived any implied warranty, any recovery must be based only on a breach…

Shampine v. Fleming

Section 152 of the statute provides that any liability which would arise under a contract to sell or a sale…